BIOPAC MP36 · 500 Hz
ECG · finger PPG · respiratory belt
High-resolution waveforms, direct event capture, and full access to the recorded channels.
Experimental methods + reporting · August 2026
An improvised six-stage session combining phenomenological interviews, a laboratory recorder, and a mobile wearable.
Abstract
One adult participant · descriptive pilot · no efficacy inference
An improvised session combined two interviews, two state-shifting interventions, a BIOPAC MP36, and an Astroskin wearable. The first aim was to capture, align, analyze, and report the sequence as one reproducible record. The second was to evaluate the mobile system beside the laboratory acquisition.
Heart-rate trajectories and matched-beat variability agreed closely. Both systems showed slow breathing during music. Later respiration diverged because the waveforms contained slow cycles and faster substructure. Finger and forehead PPG amplitude also differed, showing why sensor location matters. The outcome is a working acquisition and analysis pipeline, a clear account of its limits, and a more specific repeat protocol.
Experimental sequence
The first interview occurred before physiological recording. The MP36 and wearable then ran continuously through two resting periods, music, a second interview, and the final intervention.
Swipe to follow the full sequence →
Instrumentation
Shared channels allow direct comparison. Different sensor locations and the wearable’s additional context channels show what each system contributes.
ECG · finger PPG · respiratory belt
High-resolution waveforms, direct event capture, and full access to the recorded channels.
Three-lead ECG · forehead PPG · thoracic and abdominal respiration
Continuous mobile sensing plus motion, position, temperature, oxygen saturation, and signal-quality channels.
Both systems captured comparable cardiac peaks and beat timing.
The belts agreed during slow breathing and diverged when waveform structure became more complex.
Finger and forehead pulse amplitude differed, showing why sensor location must remain explicit.
Results
Section values are whole-phase medians or matched-beat summaries. Each breathing-rate value is calculated from individual breath periods and retains decimal precision.
0.21 BPM median absolute difference across 28 one-minute windows
section differences after matching beats detected in both raw ECG recordings
0.25 cycles/min median absolute difference overall, with a large final-phase disagreement
moderate trajectory agreement across non-equivalent finger and forehead pulse landmarks
Time course
Aligned 60-second summaries show when the two systems followed the same trajectory and when sensor location or signal structure produced different estimates.
Swipe to inspect the full time course →
Both systems measured about 4.8 cycles per minute across the phase. Heart rate remained close to Baseline 1, while matched-beat RMSSD was lower. Whole-phase PPG pulse amplitude stayed near Baseline 1 at both the finger and forehead.
Both ECGs showed a lower heart rate and higher RMSSD than Baseline 2. The MP36 belt weighted faster respiratory substructure than the wearable belts. Finger PPG amplitude rose from its Baseline 2 low while forehead PPG remained stable, which argues against reading either site as a direct measure of systemic blood flow.
Phenomenology
The first interview characterized the participant before recording. The second took place after the music and quiet rest periods.
The participant reported feeling calmer and more tired or sleepy, with time passing somewhat more slowly.
Possible chills were rated 3/10 and described as localized. The selected track produced little response for this participant. The interview describes a low-intensity experience marked mainly by relaxation.
Several questions were missing or changed wording and response anchors. The results are therefore reported item by item, with no combined score.
Next iteration
The pipeline worked. The next protocol should make intervention effects, time effects, and measurement disagreements easier to separate.
Write synchronized events into physiology, stimulus, and audiovisual records.
Vary the order of music, quiet rest, interview, control, and intervention periods across repeated sessions.
Use the same questions and response anchors before and after each target phase, and preserve qualitative detail.
Use airflow or capnography for breath identity and an appropriate reference before interpreting vascular transit or blood pressure.
Compare standardized and participant-selected music and collect immediate event-button and chill reports.
The authenticated project folder contains the unchanged acquisitions, portable signal tables, event and section files, versioned analysis packages, checksums, and frozen tool copies. Maintained code and reporting sources live in the Commons repository.
Single-participant descriptive pilot with one fixed-order session. PPG pulse amplitude reports local pulsatile blood-volume change at the sensor site. ECG-to-PPG intervals include pre-ejection time; pulse-transit interpretation would require an independent reference. Analysis version 4 · 4 September 2026.